@misc{Mazzi_Davide_“The_2025, author={Mazzi, Davide}, address={Kielce}, howpublished={online}, contents={5 Dedicatoria 9 Tabula gratulatoria 11 Elisabetta Cecconi, Christina Samson and Isabella Martini, Introduction 45 Letizia Vezzosi, The propagandistic narrative in Saint Erkenwald 69 Elisabetta Cecconi, Propaganda in 17th-century pamphlets on Jamaica: A corpus-assisted discourse study (1655-1700) 95 Elisabetta Lonati, Language ideology and national propaganda in 18th-century British dictionaries of arts and sciences 125 Massimo Sturiale, Elocution, editorials, and Englishness: The role of print media in shaping accent attitudes in the long nineteenth century 147 Christina Samson, Fanning fires. A corpus assisted analysis of women’s letters during the 1857-58 Indian uprisings 171 Matylda Włodarczyk, The bluestocking in the Polish press (1830s-1890s): Othering women through code-switching, borrowing and loan translations 201 Gabriella Del Lungo and Sabrina Cappelli, Propaganda discourse in an imperial setting: The case of Lytton Strachey’s Queen Victoria 233 DavideMazzi, “The mask is off at last!”: Propaganda discourse in the Irish Civil War 253 BirteBös, Propaganda in TIME Magazine – A diachronic corpus-assisted discourse study 281 Roberta Facchinetti, Striking a balance between norms of impartiality and adversarialness in broadcast interviews 299 Marina Bondi, Jessica Jane Nocella, Roberto Paganelli, Vaccines discourse: A diachronic case study 325 Isabel Ermida, Ageist propaganda on social media: Disguising hate speech through mock politeness}, year={2025}, publisher={Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach}, language={angielski}, abstract={Propaganda has generated sustained scholarly interest over the past few decades. While, however, historical research and argumentation studies on propaganda tend to fall short of in-depth examinations of discourse against the backdrop of a sound data base, this paper focuses on the discourse of propaganda through a comparative study of two well-known propaganda sheets from the Irish Civil War (1922-1923). Based on the ICW_Corpus designed for the project, the main discourse strategies are identified through which the (respective) enemy and their actions were represented, their moral credibility was questioned and, vice-versa, how the actions of the respective in-group were both justified and/or openly advocated as the appropriate ones for the country. Findings show that Poblacht na hÉireann and The Free State are closely comparable in using discourse to get the Irish people to endorse the aims and policies of a specific group or faction, by ensuring compliance with the actions of the group itself.}, title={“The mask is off at last!”: Propaganda discourse in the Irish Civil War}, type={tekst}, doi={10.25951/14399}, }